(G.O. Ms. No. 257, G.A.(Ser.C) Department , dated 10-06-1999)
Ref
Order:
(A) The details of employees in the zone of consideration for promotion falling under the following categories should be specifically brought to the notice of the Departmental Promotion Committees or Screening Committees:
(i) Officers under suspension;
(ii) Officers in respect of whom a charge sheet has been issued and the disciplinary proceedings are pending;
(iii) Officers in respect of whom prosecution for a criminal charge is pending.
(B) Officers who are facing enquiry, trial or investigation can be categorised into the following groups based on the nature of the allegations or charges pending against them or about to be instituted namely :
(i) an Officer with a clean record, the nature of charges or allegations against who related to minor lapses having no bearing on his integrity or efficiency, which even if held proved, would not stand in the way of his being promoted;
(ii) an Officer whose record is such that he would not be promoted, irrespective of the allegations or charges under enquiry, trial or investigation; and
(iii) an Officer whose record is such that he would have been promoted had he not been facing enquiry, trial or investigation, in respect of charges which, if held proved, would be sufficient to supersede him.
(C) The suitability of the Officers for inclusion in the panel should be considered on an overall assessment based on the record which should include namely:
(i) Adverse remarks recorded in the Annual Confidential Reports, the penalties awarded and the bad reputation of the Officer as vouchsafed by the Head of the Department and the Secretary to Government of the Department concerned;
(ii) The Officers who do not have any adverse entry in the Annual Confidential Report and who have no penalties awarded against them in the entire duration of the post and not merely in the past five years and whose reputation is vouchsafed by the Head of the Department and the Secretary to Government of the Department concerned should be considered as falling under category (iii) of item (B) above.
Section 15 • The Andhra Pradesh Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1991
15. Appointment by Promotion/Transfer to higher categories of employees who are facing disciplinary cases - Guidelines - Issued.
the-andhra-pradesh-civil-services-classification-control-and-appeal-rules-1991-sec-15.json
•
Section 15
{
"act_title": "The Andhra Pradesh Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1991",
"act_slug": "the-andhra-pradesh-civil-services-classification-control-and-appeal-rules-1991",
"section_label": "Section",
"section": {
"number": "15",
"title": "15. Appointment by Promotion/Transfer to higher categories of employees who are facing disciplinary cases - Guidelines - Issued.",
"chapter": null,
"content": "(G.O. Ms. No. 257, G.A.(Ser.C) Department , dated 10-06-1999)\nRef\nOrder:\n(A) The details of employees in the zone of consideration for promotion falling under the following categories should be specifically brought to the notice of the Departmental Promotion Committees or Screening Committees:\n(i) Officers under suspension;\n(ii) Officers in respect of whom a charge sheet has been issued and the disciplinary proceedings are pending;\n(iii) Officers in respect of whom prosecution for a criminal charge is pending.\n(B) Officers who are facing enquiry, trial or investigation can be categorised into the following groups based on the nature of the allegations or charges pending against them or about to be instituted namely :\n(i) an Officer with a clean record, the nature of charges or allegations against who related to minor lapses having no bearing on his integrity or efficiency, which even if held proved, would not stand in the way of his being promoted;\n(ii) an Officer whose record is such that he would not be promoted, irrespective of the allegations or charges under enquiry, trial or investigation; and\n(iii) an Officer whose record is such that he would have been promoted had he not been facing enquiry, trial or investigation, in respect of charges which, if held proved, would be sufficient to supersede him.\n(C) The suitability of the Officers for inclusion in the panel should be considered on an overall assessment based on the record which should include namely:\n(i) Adverse remarks recorded in the Annual Confidential Reports, the penalties awarded and the bad reputation of the Officer as vouchsafed by the Head of the Department and the Secretary to Government of the Department concerned;\n(ii) The Officers who do not have any adverse entry in the Annual Confidential Report and who have no penalties awarded against them in the entire duration of the post and not merely in the past five years and whose reputation is vouchsafed by the Head of the Department and the Secretary to Government of the Department concerned should be considered as falling under category (iii) of item (B) above.",
"footnote": "",
"is_definition": false,
"sort_order": 22
},
"prev_section": "14",
"next_section": "16"
}