(a) the objection was taken in the Court of first instance at or before the hearing at which issues were first framed and recorded, or in the lower Appellate Court in the memorandum of appeal to that Court, or
(b) the Appellate Court is satisfied, for reasons to be recorded by it in writing, that the suit or appeal was over-valued or under-valued and that the over-valuation or under-valuation thereof has prejudicially affected the disposal of the suit or appeal on its merits:
Section 7 • The Goa, Daman and Diu Suits Valuation Act, 1965
7. Objections to jurisdiction on ground of erroneous valuation.
goa-daman-and-diu-suits-valuation-act-1965-sec-7.json
•
Section 7
{
"act_title": "The Goa, Daman and Diu Suits Valuation Act, 1965",
"act_slug": "goa-daman-and-diu-suits-valuation-act-1965",
"section_label": "Section",
"section": {
"number": "7",
"title": "7. Objections to jurisdiction on ground of erroneous valuation.",
"chapter": null,
"content": "(a) the objection was taken in the Court of first instance at or before the hearing at which issues were first framed and recorded, or in the lower Appellate Court in the memorandum of appeal to that Court, or\n(b) the Appellate Court is satisfied, for reasons to be recorded by it in writing, that the suit or appeal was over-valued or under-valued and that the over-valuation or under-valuation thereof has prejudicially affected the disposal of the suit or appeal on its merits:",
"footnote": "",
"is_definition": false,
"sort_order": 6
},
"prev_section": "6",
"next_section": "8"
}