(i) that it will be to the advantage of the parties, so far as time and expense are concerned, to opt for one or other of these modes of settlement referred to in Section 89 rather than seek a trial on the disputes arising in the suit;
(ii) that, where there is no relationship between the parties which requires to be preserved, it may be in the interest of the parties to seek reference of the matter of arbitration as envisaged in clause (a) of sub-section (1) of Section 89.
(iii) that, where there is a relationship between the parties which requires to be preserved, it may -be in the interest of parties to seek reference of the matter to conciliation or mediation, as envisaged in clauses (b) or (d) of subsection (1) of Section 89.
Explanation.
(iv) that, where parties are interested in a final settlement which may lead to a compromise, it will be in the interests of the parties to seek reference of the matter to Lok Adalat or to judicial settlement as envisaged in clause (c) of sub-section (1) of Section 89.
(v) the difference between the different modes of settlement, namely, arbitration, conciliation, mediation and judicial settlement as explained below ;
Section 4 • Chhattisgarh Civil Procedure Alternative Dispute Resolution Rules, 2006
4. Court to give guidance to parties while giving direction to opt.
chhattisgarh-civil-procedure-alternative-dispute-resolution-rules-2006-sec-4.json
•
Section 4
{
"act_title": "Chhattisgarh Civil Procedure Alternative Dispute Resolution Rules, 2006",
"act_slug": "chhattisgarh-civil-procedure-alternative-dispute-resolution-rules-2006",
"section_label": "Section",
"section": {
"number": "4",
"title": "4. Court to give guidance to parties while giving direction to opt.",
"chapter": null,
"content": "(i) that it will be to the advantage of the parties, so far as time and expense are concerned, to opt for one or other of these modes of settlement referred to in Section 89 rather than seek a trial on the disputes arising in the suit;\n(ii) that, where there is no relationship between the parties which requires to be preserved, it may be in the interest of the parties to seek reference of the matter of arbitration as envisaged in clause (a) of sub-section (1) of Section 89.\n(iii) that, where there is a relationship between the parties which requires to be preserved, it may -be in the interest of parties to seek reference of the matter to conciliation or mediation, as envisaged in clauses (b) or (d) of subsection (1) of Section 89.\nExplanation.\n(iv) that, where parties are interested in a final settlement which may lead to a compromise, it will be in the interests of the parties to seek reference of the matter to Lok Adalat or to judicial settlement as envisaged in clause (c) of sub-section (1) of Section 89.\n(v) the difference between the different modes of settlement, namely, arbitration, conciliation, mediation and judicial settlement as explained below ;",
"footnote": "",
"is_definition": false,
"sort_order": 3
},
"prev_section": "3",
"next_section": "5"
}